Some electric utilities and other CO2 emission polluters are allowed to purchase carbon offsets to achieve a portion of their mandated emissions cuts, in effect, to pay others to reduce carbon emissions in their stead. Some individuals, college and universities, and for-profit and non-profit institutions have chosen voluntarily to purchase carbon offsets as a way of reducing their carbon footprint. But do offsets actually succeed in reducing carbon emissions? What separates a legitimate offset from one that is not? How should we measure the true impact of an offset? How do carbon offsets compare to other policies for reducing carbon emissions in terms of efficiency, equity, and justice? Is there something inherently wrong about “commodifying” the atmosphere? Is there something inherently wrong about selling or buying the right to pollute? Should colleges and universities be using the purchase of offsets to achieve “carbon neutrality?”
Format: tutorial; This tutorial will be taught remotely via Zoom meetings. Each student will be the tutorial partner of one other student, and each pair of tutorial partners will meet with the instructor for 75 minutes each week. Individual "office hour meetings" will also occur via Zoom meetings.
Grading: no pass/fail option,
no fifth course option
a 5- to 7-page paper every other week; a 3-page written critique every other week; one re-write paper
ECON 110 or the equivalent, permission of instructor
first-year students and sophomores intending to major in Economics and/or to major or concentrate in Environmental Studies
This course is cross-listed and the prefixes carry the following divisional credit:
Each student will write five 5-7 page papers on which I will provide written feedback regarding grammar, style, and argument. Each student will write five 3-page critiques of their partner's papers. As the final assignment, each student will revise one of their five papers.
ENVI Environmental Policy
POEC Comparative POEC/Public Policy Courses